Estimating the nest-success rate and the number of nests initiated by radiomarked mallards / Rachel J. McPherson, Todd W. Arnold, Llwellyn M. Armstrong, and Carl J. Schwarz.
Material type: TextSeries: Journal of Wildlife Management. 67(4) 843-851 Publication details: 2003.Description: 28 cmLOC classification:- MCP
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic Journal | IWWR Supported Research | Non-fiction | MCP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 16788 |
Browsing IWWR Supported Research shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Includes bibliographical references (pages 850-851).
W e developed a methodology for estimating the nest-success rate, the total number of nests initiated, and
the average number of nests initiated per breeding pair by a group of radiomarked mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)
females. Our methodology allows incomplete observation of all nests initiated and is related to current nest-success
models. However, our method relaxes the assumption of equal daily survival rates made by the Mayfield
method, and it incorporates the detection probabilities of newly encountered nests, which are ignored by the Mayfield
method. Model selection and model averaging using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) are used so that
estimates are no longer conditional upon the best-fitting model. Estimated daily nest-survival rates in our example
were 0.94 (SE = 0.005), which gives an estimated nest-success rate over 25 days of 0.20 (SE = 0.03). We estimated
that our sample of 124 resident females initiated 237 (SE = 15) nests for an estimated 1.91 (SE = 0.12) nests initiated
per female. This was substantiallyla rgert han the observed( uncorrected)1 .41 nests per female, despite the
high sampling effort and the fact that the nests were located at an average of 5 days of age. Our estimate of nests
initiated was substantially more precise than similar estimates derived using the Mayfield method. We estimate an
approximate 6-fold reduction in the sample size required by our method compared to the Mayfield method to
obtain comparable precision for this paramete