Waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian parklands / Todd W. Arnold, Lea M. Craig-Moore, Llwellyn M. Armstrong, David W. Howerter, James H. Devries, Brian L. Joynt, Robert B. Emery, and Michaeal G. Anderson.
Material type:
TextSeries: Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(8) 2542-2549 Publication details: 2007Description: illustrations ; 28 cmLOC classification: - ARN
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic Journal
|
IWWR Supported Research | Non-fiction | ARN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 16733 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 2548-2549).
Dense nesting cover (DNC) has been a conspicuous component of habitat management for upland-nesting ducks for .30
years, but its benefits for nesting ducks have been contentious. During 1994–1999 we monitored 3,058 dabbling duck (Anas spp.) nests in 84
DNC fields located throughout the Canadian Parklands to examine sources of among-field variation in nest density and nesting success. Nest
density averaged 1.51 (SE¼0.15) nests/ha and overall nesting success was 20.4%, but there was pronounced annual variation in both estimates.
Nesting success increased with increasing field size (range¼6–111 ha), but nest density remained constant. Nest density increased with percent
wetland habitat within DNC fields and declined with percent perennial cover in the surrounding 2.4 32.4-km landscape, but these variables
were not important for predicting nesting success. Nest abundance and nesting success roughly doubled in fields seeded with alfalfa (Medicago
sativa) or sweet clovers (Melilotus spp.), but there was no benefit from using native as opposed to tame grasses. We recommend that waterfowl
managers in the Canadian Parklands establish DNC with alfalfa in large fields in landscapes with abundant wetlands but minimal competing
cover.